Friday, October 26, 2007

American Apparel




Check out this article about the American Apparel ad shown above.

"A woman who lives in this neighborhood, contacted wcbstv.com to tell us she's sent a petition to American Apparel with dozens of resident's signatures asking them to take the billboard down."

The woman mentioned above is named Jessi and you can check out her blog at http://annienyc.blogspot.com/. The two pictures used here were also taken by Jessi.

I highly recommend checking out her blog entries about American Apparel at http://annienyc.blogspot.com/search/label/american%20apparel. Start with the entry at the bottom of the page and scroll up to read more recent entries. Find out about this controversial billboard and how Jessi took it upon herself to contact CBS and inspire their news story. The blog entries detail Jessi's reaction to the billboard as well as the opinions of other local residents, like the man who owns the business right underneath the giant ad.

Jessi says, "this billboard is the epitome of dehumanization."

I also think this ad is completely sexist and dehumanizing. By not even showing the woman's face, they are further turning her into a sexual object. By repeatedly showing women in sexually objectified images, American Apparel is-- inadvertently or not-- sending a message to society about women. And the message they are sending is false and dangerous.



Ads, especially 50 ft. tall posters, send messages. So the more ads like this that we allow, the more we are sending these negative messages to people, in particular impressionable young boys and girls. The messages we teach our children influence what kind of people they grow up to be. Do we want to teach our children that women are sexual objects who should be used and disrespected? Of course not! That will benefit absolutely no one. Even if a company insists on using sex in their ads, whether or not it will help sales, it is completely possible to do that without taking it to the level of degrading women.



(the above ad is diagonally across the street from a playground.)

By portraying a woman as a sexual object, an ad is saying that her feelings and personality are not important. Many people have urgently expressed concern over a possible connection between images like this and real-life violence toward women.

I am once again going to quote wikipedia on the dangers of dehumanization:

"Dehumanization is a process by which members of a group of people assert the "inferiority" of another group through subtle or overt acts or statements. Dehumanization may be directed by an organization (such as a state) or may be the composite of individual sentiments and actions.... Anthropologists Ashley Montagu and Floyd Matson famously wrote that dehumanization might well be considered "the fifth horsemen of the apocalypse" because of the inestimable damage it has dealt to society. When people become things, the logic follows, they become dispensable - and any atrocity can be justified."



From the CBS article:

"The consumer has the power," Passikoff said. "Enough letters written to a corporation regarding any kind of a campaign and you'll see a campaign dropped entirely."


So, boycott American Apparel! Write them a letter if you don't like their ads.

Contact content advisor Alexandra Spunt at alexandra@americanapparel.net,
or write to adrian@americanapparel.net.

Be like Jessi and do something. If everyone who hates these ads were to do something about it, I think we would see a big change; most women I talk to do not like to see women portrayed like this, and many men feel the same way. So don't be passive, and don't be silent!



20 comments:

lordmelkor said...

i hate AA. not only are they sexist (imo, they worse than the calvin jeans ads) but they're incredibly racist too!

Anonymous said...

Get over it...

Anonymous said...

They are beautiful adverts and entirely human. Because human beings are beautiful and sexual (on occasions). They celebrate life and love. Relax. Taking an opposite stance to them is wrong-headed. And muddled outrage is the easiest mask to wear.

Nadia Matta said...

there's nothing wrong with being beautiful and sexual, and celebrating life and love. i'm opposed to sexism, not sexuality. i'm very careful about when i use the term, and my viewpoint on the harmful effects of objectification and sexism are based on what i have learned through reading about the results of scientific studies done on the effects of these things (i even read a study specifically dealing with the way women are presented as headless body parts in certain ads, and the negative effects this can have.) i am opposed to sexism, racism, etc., and i don't think that is 'wrong-headed,' i think it's about love and positivity. in response to your comment, my 'outrage' isn't muddled and i'm not wearing any masks. and yes, humans celebrate life and love, but unfortunately, many also practice exploitation and degradation. i believe in not only celebrating the positive aspects, but fighting against the negative aspects, as well.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous (on April 1, in quite an April-Fool's-joke of an opinion) says that these ads are beautiful and human, and yet, I only see one-half of humanity (the female half) in these disgustingly Pavlovian ads. If AA were really attempting to celebrate humanity in its entirety, I'd expect it not only to include the other half (actually, 49%) of the population, but to occasionally focus on some of the female half's less sexual aspects as well. And a 60-foot spread of anonymous (but don't worry--it's not yours, right?), always female, and un-unionized-to-boot ass is not sexual (any more than prostitution is sexual for the women and girls! involved)--it's just plain exploitative and gross.

Also, as modern "empowered" women, we should be able to find better ways to get attention and feel validated than parading around in our panties, right? Or by supporting our sisters in their misguided efforts to do so...

By the way, I just commented on Jessi's page how I went out to eat tonight and saw a new level of alienating and irresponsible advertising in the AA windows facing Bereket. There is a video of a TOTALLY topless woman facing the public sidewalk where the benches are. She's even totally naked (in profile) in some shots. My husband and I both complained to the "manager at the moment" (Becky) that it was not only an offensive ad but also a totally ILLEGAL one, since female nipple is facing a public venue, and that it needed to be removed NOW, and she gave us a blow-off "I'll bring it up with my supervisor when she returns" response, then laughed it up with the store "DJ" (what kind of store needs a DJ, anyway?) as we left.

We have always boycotted that lame store and am unsure what else to do. Letters? Police? Police are busy with more urgent stuff, and they'd just put the ad up again the next day anyway. AA didn't care about a petition with 75 signatures, so what are they going to think of my letter?

I LIVE here, dammit!

Anonymous said...

I don't think this ad discrimate women, have you ever seen a calvin klein ad or any of the thousand other ads depicting attractive men/woman in sexual situation? Smarten up and join the rest of the liberated world. Women don't need to hide their sexuality or beauty to be taken seriously or respected

Nadia said...

In response to the last comment, yes i've seen calvin klein ads and similar ads, but that doesn't change how i feel about american apparel ads. as i've stated a lot in this blog, it's not nudity or sexuality in the ads that i dislike, it is the way in which they are portrayed. there are many ways to present women, and many ways to present sexuality... these things can be done artistically, or in a very degrading very, or anywhere in between. i would prefer something to have more nudity and not be sexist, than be sexist but have less nudity. i don't think that makes me stupid or un-liberated, as you said. of course women don't need to hide their beauty or sexuality to be respected, i feel like i've been clear about that throughout this blog. that aa bilboard, though, is not-in my opinion- an example of a woman displaying her beauty and being proud of herself.

in response to the anonymous comment before that, thanks for trying to make a difference, and i wish i had more answers for you! i do think every letter written to a company does help, though, cuz they add up.

MWS said...

given the fact that the owner has slept with most of models in these photos, settle numerous suites out of court, allegations of statutory rape, and fires people within the manufacturing company who try to unionize, there is nothing beautiful or human about american apparel as a company. they hide behind an image that is mostly false. there is nothing wrong with sexuality. nothing at all. but given your money to a person who is a bad human being is wrong. therefore i cannot support american apparel. try alternative apparel. they are actually sweat shop free and choose to not use sexuality to sell their products (if that's your issue).

Anonymous said...

I applaud your efforts!! Not everyone in North America believes that sex and sexuality should be just another commodity...and that public exposure is beautiful. Sex belongs in private, (and between a married man and woman) not in public. Aside from the considerable moral issues involved, it is rude and vulgar to be public about sex. It seems an overwhelming fight but we must all commit to keeping our nation cleaner.

Anonymous said...

These ads are showing empowered women, free to embrace their sexuality. They are definitely not meant as sexist.
If you don't agree, that's probably because you're a monkey.
Cheers!

Xian said...

THIS IS NOT SEXISM.

Obi said...

I love American Apparel and their ads. (Especially their ads.) Let's not be afraid of sex people--it's 2009!

Anonymous said...

the women that get so angry over advertisements are just upset that they dont look like said model. it wrong to think of women as objects but a bilboad is an object, too much is being read into this blatent atemt to sell clothing and nothing more...

Bones said...

Trust me, I'm not "jealous" of the women displaying their crotches here. Stay in school, kiddos. Being objectified is not being "empowered." Ever read 1984? Ever hear of doublespeak?

Billy said...

Can we stop throwing insults at American Apparel just for one controversial advert?
OK, so maybe a few people were offended by this poster? (And before you mention your petition that is only a very small percentage of people that have seen this Advert)
Maybe you don't like what you see, and don't let me stop you from coming and slagging AA off.
But before you do, you should know that AA are one of the most ethical multinational clothing manufacturers in the world. If you don't believe me? then take a look for yourself: http://www.americanapparel.net/contact/


DON'T DON'T BUY FROM THEM!

Audrey said...

Ok well,it seems to me that the problem here is not really about women sexuality but about the fact that girls crotches are used in order to increase profit. By that i mean: AA dosent want to celebrate love and sexuality (let's just say that this isnt their first goal), they want to sell clothes. They have a big big ammount of money put aside only in order to find the best way to sell tights, socks and panties. The best way they have found is half nuded girls. Now we can ask ourselves if the way they've chosen is the best. What images does that ads gives to the teens who are searching themselves, seaking sometimes for a model. I'm just asking myself then if we're not just banalizing the effect of this ad. Why aa does not use more mature women as beautifull as there is some with a diploma in their hands...better marketing shot with the nude teens...

David said...

AA have shown their true colours recently with their scandalous behaviour surrounding the unlawful Woody Allen adverts

sex, humanity, the naked human body - it's all beautiful. But AA ad's are not seeking to put that message forward. Their message is 'Buy our clothing' and they've proved they don't care how it affects people, as long as they turn a profit

Anonymous said...

i am doing a project on this in school. is there a good website where i can find useful facts about what all american apparel is trying to show besides naked teens and 80's clothing? i mean i know its all apart of getting good business but its hard to understand how with all the people against their ads they continue to do what they always do.

Nadia said...

check out my other posting on american apparel, titled 'i've left american apparel alone too long'...
i think it's on the next page in the archives of this blog

there's a long article on the store included in that posting

:)

Rawr said...

People are so backwards today that I'm sure they'd find an ad of a nude women tied up in a dark room with a blind fold and gag "empowering" and "showing how beautiful the human body is."

If ads such as these aren't exploiting, then I wonder how long til we see similar ones with children. Anyone who would be against them are obviously prudes who cannot see the beauty of the human body.